Saturday, March 20, 2010

Franklin v. Terr, 201 F. 3d 1098 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2000 - Google Scholar

Franklin v. Terr, 201 F. 3d 1098 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2000 - Google Scholar: "An allegation that a private person conspired with a state official satisfies the requirement that a defendant act under color of state authority. See Adickes v. S.H. Kress 1101 & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 152, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970) (holding that a conspiracy with a state official is sufficient to satisfy the state action requirement of § 1983); United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 865 F.2d 1539, 1540 (9th Cir.1989) (holding that '[p]rivate parties act under color of state law if they willfully participate in joint action with state officials to deprive others of constitutional rights')."

LinkWithin - Install Widget on Blogger

LinkWithin - Install Widget on Blogger

http://www.linkwithin.com/learn?ref=widget

Install page for related links

LinkWithin - Install Widget on Blogger

LinkWithin - Install Widget on Blogger

http://www.linkwithin.com/learn?ref=widget

Install page for related links

Friday, March 19, 2010

Friday, February 26, 2010

Facebook | Anna Hayes

Facebook Anna Hayes

Show/Hide
Friend request later

Beware during settlement - Don't forget Attorney Fees

FROM:  The website of McCormick Barstow LLP http://www.mccormickbarstow.com/

Article:   What you don’t say can and will be used against you or: How NOT to settle your clients’ cases

Show/Hide